SSI News

Don't miss the latest homeland security news from your source for information that matters.

Viewing entries tagged Obama

3/27/12 - Obama tells summit that nuclear terrorism is a threat

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Tuesday, 27 March 2012 Category Daily News

SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA — U.S. President Barack Obama said Tuesday the threat of nuclear weapons remains a potent challenge for the globe to confront, telling foreign leaders that "the security of the world depends on the actions that we take."

Obama, speaking at a nuclear security summit in South Korea, said the international community had made progress in removing nuclear materials and improving security at nuclear facilities around the globe. As a result, he said, more of the world's nuclear materials won't fall into the hands of terrorists.

Tags: nuclear weapons, Russia, UN, Medvedev, Syria, Obama

3/26/12 - Government to keep data on citizens with no terrorism ties

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Monday, 26 March 2012 Category Daily News

WASHINGTON— — The U.S. intelligence community will be able to store information about Americans with no ties to terrorism for up to five years under new Obama administration guidelines.

Until now, the National Counterterrorism Center had to immediately destroy information about Americans that was already stored in other government databases when there were no clear ties to terrorism.

Tags: terrorist, Congress, counterterrorism, Obama, surveillance

2-11-2012 Racing Against The Clock

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 10 February 2012 Category Daily News

2-9-2012 US soldiers train for agricultural mission in Afghanistan

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Thursday, 09 February 2012 Category Daily News

Before they're deployed to help stabilize Afghanistan, hundreds of U.S. Army troops, Marines, and other government personnel head to Fresno, Calif., for a crash course on that war-torn country's most vital industry: agriculture.

Tags: U.S. Department of Agriculture, The Agricultural Development for the Afghanistan Pre-deployment Training, soldiers, Obama, mission, military, Marines, Army, agriculture, Afghanistan, ADAPT

2-4-2012 Panetta believes Israel could strike Iran this spring

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 03 February 2012 Category Daily News

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has come to the conclusion there is a growing likelihood Israel could attack Iran sometime this spring in an effort to destroy its suspected nuclear weapons program, according to a senior administration official.

Tags: war on terror, Obama, Muslims, military, Middle East, Mexico Cartel Drugs, law enforcement, israel, Iran, HSN, homeland security network, homeland security, conflict, bomb, attack

2-3-2012 Hackers strike again: California city’s site latest target

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 03 February 2012 Category Daily News

In another apparent cyberattack on a government website, the official site for the city of Sacramento, Calif., has been hacked and a number of its services and pages, including its home page, being taken down, reports Govtech.com.

Tags: White House, Turkish Hacker, sacramento, Obama, network hacker, law enforcement, Justice Department, HSN, homeland security network, homeland security, hacking, hacker, government website hack, FTC, FBI, Cyber Security, computer hacking, California

2-2-2012 CSI Cell Phone

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Thursday, 02 February 2012 Category Daily News

Mobile device forensics forecast: continued oscillation, chance of cloud computing.

Tags: technology, SSI, police, phone, Obama, news, military, law enforcement, HSN, homeland security network, homeland security, first responders, first responder, Cyber Security, CSI, cell phone

2-1-2012 Iran nuclear program stokes US concern

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Wednesday, 01 February 2012 Category Daily News

Iran took center stage on Tuesday as top U.S. intelligence officials and senators discussed what could trigger a military response to the Islamic Republic's nuclear activities.

Tags: terrorists, terrorist, terrorism, Syria, senate committee on intelligence, security, risk, Radical Islam, Petraeus, Pakistan, ODNI, Obama, nuclear, news, Muslims, law enforcement, Jihad, Iran, intelligence, HSN, homeland security network, homeland security, Gitmo, Explosive, Detainees, Cybersecurity, Clapper, CIA, C.I.A, bomb, attack, Ahmadinejad, Afghanistan, China

1-30-2012 Audit: U.S. Defense Department can’t account for billions for Iraq

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Monday, 30 January 2012 Category Daily News

The U.S. Defense Department cannot account for about $2 billion it was given to cover Iraq-related expenses and is not providing Iraq with a complete list of U.S.-funded reconstruction projects, according to two new government audits.

Tags: defense department, homeland security, homeland security network, HSN, Iraq, law enforcement, Obama, SSI, war on terror

1-26-2012 Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran President, Says Country Is Ready To Resume Nuclear Talks

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Thursday, 26 January 2012 Category Daily News

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran is ready to revive talks with the world powers, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Thursday, as toughening sanctions aim at forcing Tehran to sharply scale back its nuclear program.

 

Tags: terrorist, terrorism, terror, SSI, security, risk, Radical Islam, Obama, nuclear talks, news, Muslims, military, Middle East, Jihad, Iran, HSN, homeland security network, homeland security, bomb, Ahmadinejad

1-19-2012 Obama Reportedly Calls For Iran Talks In Secret Letter

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Thursday, 19 January 2012 Category Daily News

TEHRAN, Iran — An Iranian lawmaker claimed Wednesday that President Barack Obama called for direct talks with Iran in a secret letter to the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader that also warned Tehran against closing the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Tags: homeland security, homeland security network, HSN, Iran, Middle East, Muslims, Obama, Radical Islam, risk, security, SSI, terror, terrorism

1-17-2012 The mutating al Qaeda threat

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Tuesday, 17 January 2012 Category Daily News

Terrorists are adapting and expanding

Tags: homeland security, threats, Obama, United States, terrorist, terrorism, al-Qaeda

1/16/12 - Netanyahu deputy "disappointed" with Obama on Iran

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Monday, 16 January 2012 Category Daily News

(Reuters) - A senior Israeli official voiced disappointment in the Obama administration on Sunday, saying "election-year considerations" lay behind its caution over tough Iran sanctions sought by U.S. legislators.

Tags: Iran, israel, Obama

1-13-2012 Army Mulls Life After Afghanistan

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 13 January 2012 Category Daily News

In the wake of Afghanistan, the Army may assign combat units to potential hotspots around the globe as a way to prepare Soldiers for everything from disaster relief to all-out combat.

Tags: Obama, Afghan war, Afghanistan, US Army

1-13-2012 U.S. Sends Top Iranian Leader a Warning on Strait Threat

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 13 January 2012 Category Daily News

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is relying on a secret channel of communication to warn Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that closing the Strait of Hormuz is a “red line” that would provoke an American response, according to United States government officials.

Tags: global conflict, Obama, Iran, United States, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

1-7-2012 Obama Signs National Defense Authorization Act into Law

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 06 January 2012 Category Daily News

On December 31, 2011, with the President's signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the writ of habeas corpus — a civil right so fundamental to Anglo-American common law history that it predates the Magna Carta — is voidable upon the command of the President of the United States. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is also revocable at his will.

The United States, as Senator Lindsey Graham declared during floor debate in the Senate, is now a theatre in the War on Terror and Americans "can be detained indefinitely ... and when you say to the interrogator, 'I want my lawyer,' the interrogator will say, 'You don't have a right to a lawyer because you're a military threat.'"

Don't worry, though. Although the President now wields this enormous power, he adamantly denies that he will ever "authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens." That guarantee is all that stands between American citizens and life in prison on arbitrary charges of conspiring to commit or committing acts belligerent to the homeland.

The President continued by explaining that to indefinitely detain American citizens without a trial on the charges laid against them "would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation."

Ironically, the signing statement in which President Obama gave these assurances is itself violative of the Constitution, the separation of powers established therein, and only demonstrates his proclivity for ignoring constitutional restraints on the exercise of power once those powers have been placed (albeit illegally) by a complicit Congress at his disposal.

Once development of it begins in the body politic, the muscle of tyranny never atrophies.

Supporters of the law (including President Obama) point to the "undeniable" success achieved against "suspected terrorists." Although President Obama claims that the section of the NDAA (1021) authorizing the President to detain these suspects "breaks no new ground and is unnecessary," the President's interpretation of just who inhabits the universe of likely suspects (as explained in the signing statement appended to the NDAA) includes "al-Qa'ida and its affiliates and adherents...."

Since the beginning of hostilities in the wake of 9/11, the federal government has often had problems proving membership in al-Qaeda of those arrested as "enemy combatants" in the War on Terror, so imagine the difficulty they would face in presenting evidence of affiliation or adherence to that shadowy, ill-defined organization.

The danger of the vagueness of crucial terms of the NDAA was addressed by current Republican presidential contender Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) during a phone conference with supporters in Iowa:

The dangers in the NDAA are its alarmingly vague, undefined criteria for who can be indefinitely detained by the US government without trial. It is now no longer limited to members of al Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyone accused of “substantially supporting” such groups or “associated forces.” How closely associated? And what constitutes "substantial" support? What if it was discovered that someone who committed a terrorist act was once involved with a charity? Or supported a political candidate? Are all donors of that charity or supporters of that candidate now suspect, and subject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity now an associated force?

The Bill of Rights has no exemption for "really bad people" or terrorists or even non-citizens. It is a key check on government power against any person. That is not a weakness in our legal system; it is the very strength of our legal system. The NDAA attempts to justify abridging the Bill of Rights on the theory that rights are suspended in a time of war, and the entire Unites States is a battlefield in the War on Terror. This is a very dangerous development indeed. Beware.

Fortunately for the President, the NDAA absolves him of the requirement of gathering and presenting to an impartial judge evidence probative of such evil associations. The mere suspicion of such suffices as a justification for the indefinite imprisonment of those so suspected.

As if the foregoing roster of Stalinist-style authoritarianism isn't an imposing enough threat to freedom, there is an additional aspect of the new law that places the civil liberties of Americans in greater peril.

The NDAA places the American military at the disposal of the President for the apprehension, arrest, and detention of those suspected of posing a danger to the homeland (whether inside or outside the borders of the United States and whether the suspect be a citizen or foreigner). The endowment of such a power to the President by the Congress is nothing less than a de facto legislative repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, the law forbidding the use of the military in domestic law enforcement.

Again, the aforementioned Senator Lindsey Graham has no qualms shredding that parchment protection from tyranny, either. Said Graham: "I don't believe fighting al Qaeda is a law enforcement function. I believe our military should be deeply involved in fighting these guys at home and abroad."

The undeniable unconstitutionality of the National Defense Authorization Act and its violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is likely to result in the necessity of states nullifying those sections of the law that exceed the enumerated powers of Congress. This remedy would be applied by the legislatures of the states in an effort to protect its citizens from arrest and extradition by armed members of the federal armed forces. This effort to resist unfettered federal authority would rival the intensity of the Nullification Crisis of the 1830s — a confrontation that culminated in the Civil War and the death of at least 600,000 Americans.

While the frightening abolition of civil liberties contained in the NDAA could not have been codified were it not for the signature of President Obama, the complicity of the Congress in easing our Republic's "slip into tyranny" should not be overlooked.

Sixty-eight percent of the House of Representatives voted for this measure, for example. Perhaps in the elections of 2012 those lawmakers who voted in favor of the measure will be held accountable by their constituents for such an inexplicable violation of the congressional oath of office and its requirement that members protect the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Other sections of the 500-plus-page, $662-billion law authorizes the continued expenditure of money on the perpetuation of two unconstitutional foreign conflicts (Iraq and Afghanistan), as well as greasing the skids for the deployment of the American military into Iran if economic sanctions fail to persuade Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to see things our way.

While the NDAA's effect on the Constitution is all but ignored by the administration and Congress, its effect on oil prices is taken very seriously. Under applicable provisions of the new law, President Obama may punish international firms which buy oil from Iran. President Obama has an out, however, if he believes that the imposition of such penalties is driving up the price of crude.

The New York Times quotes an unnamed administration official who explains the importance of vigilantly protecting the stability of the volatile oil market: "We have to do it in a timely way and phased way to avoid repercussions to the oil market, and make sure the revenues to Iran are reduced."

Finally, President Obama signed the NDAA, and the depth of the impact of this law on the freedom of Americans and the perpetuation of our Constitution cannot be measured.  Promises to restrain oneself from abusing power are unreliable. As Thomas Jefferson once warned:

Free government is founded in jealousy, not confidence. It is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind those we are obliged to trust with power.... In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in men, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.

Tags: DHS, National Defense Authorization Act, Obama

1-7-2012 Obama Administration Plans Change In Immigration Rule

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Friday, 06 January 2012 Category Daily News

Currently, undocumented immigrants must leave the country before they can ask the government to waive a three- to 10-year ban on legally coming back to the U.S. The length of the ban depends on how long they have lived in the U.S. without permission.

The official said the new rule would let children and spouses of citizens ask the government to decide on the waiver request before the undocumented immigrant heads to his or her home country to apply for a visa. The undocumented immigrants still must go home to finish the visa process to come back to the U.S., but getting the waiver ahead of time could reduce the time an undocumented immigrant is out of the country.

The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the proposed policy change had not been made public.

The waiver shift is the latest move by President Barack Obama to make changes to immigration policy without congressional action. Congressional Republicans repeatedly have criticized the administration for policy changes they describe as providing "backdoor amnesty" to undocumented immigrants.

Immigrants who do not have criminal records and who have only violated immigration laws can win a waiver if they can prove that their absence would cause an "extreme hardship" for their citizen spouse or parent. The government received about 23,000 hardship applications in 2011 and more than 70 percent were approved, the official said.

Applications for the waiver can take as long as six months to be acted upon, the official said. The new rule is expected to reduce that processing time to just days or weeks, the official added.

"This would streamline the process (and) reduce the time of separation between family members," the official said.

The proposal will be published in the Federal Register on Friday. The official said the administration hopes to change the rule later this year.

Immigration has become a difficult issue for Obama ahead of the November election. As a presidential candidate, he pledged to change what many consider to be a broken immigration system.

To that end, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced plans last year to review some 300,000 pending deportation cases in an effort to target criminal undocumented immigrants, repeat immigration law violators and those who pose a national security or public safety threat. Napolitano said the DHS would delay indefinitely the cases of many undocumented immigrants who have no criminal record and those who have been arrested for only minor traffic violations or other misdemeanors.

A pilot program to review about 12,000 cases pending in immigration court in Baltimore and Denver was launched in November and ends next week. The review is expected to expand to other jurisdictions later this year.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton also issued a memo in June outlining how immigration authorities could use discretion in deciding which undocumented immigrants to arrest and put into deportation proceedings. Morton wrote in the memo that discretion could be used in a variety of cases, including for people with no criminal record and young people brought to the country illegally as children.

Congressional Republicans have decried the policy changes, arguing that the Obama administration is circumventing Congress to essentially provide amnesty to countless undocumented immigrants.

Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, has been among the most vocal critics and has accused Obama repeatedly of not enforcing immigration law.

Several attempts at an immigration law overhaul have failed in recent years, including the so-called DREAM Act, which would have allowed for some young undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to earn legal status if they went to college or joined the military.

Tags: DHS, border security, immigration, Obama

1-5-2012: Obama unveils plans for pared down military

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Thursday, 05 January 2012 Category Daily News

"We are determined to maintain a ready and capable force, even as we reduce our overall capacity," the administration said in a summary of its defense priorities released as the president began to speak. "Our global responsibilities are significant; we cannot afford to fail."

The administration singled out China and Iran, pledging to keep sea lanes open and successfully combat missile, electronic, cyber and other threats.

"Over the long-term China's emergence as a regional power will have the potential to affect the U.S. economy and our security in a variety of ways," the summary noted.

The new strategy is the result of months of study at the Pentagon. It reflects a high-stakes, high-wire balancing act by Obama as he faces a more austere budget climate combined with continued high U.S. responsibilities at home and overseas.

"The balance between available resources and our security needs has never been more delicate," the administration said.

With his announcement at the Pentagon, Obama hopes to reassure the military brass, as well as send a clear message to allies and adversaries that the U.S. maintains its ability, and willingness, to fight.

"The tide of war is receding," Obama said in his prepared remarks. "But the question that this strategy answers is what kind of military will we need after the long wars of the last decade are over. And today, we're moving forward, from a position of strength."

"Yes, our military will be leaner, but the world must know—the United States is going to maintain our military superiority with Armed Forces that are agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies and threats."

Obama's announcement coincides with multiple missile tests by Iran in recent days and comments by Iranian leaders that they could choke off the Strait of Homuz, a major transit point for world oil supplies.

The announcement also comes amidst frequent criticism of the president and his defense priorities from his political rivals, including candidates for the Republican presidential nomination.

In a signed introduction to the new priorities, Obama called this a time of transition, noting the successful raid on the Osama bin Laden compound and the death of the al Qaeda leader, as well as the end to the war in Iraq and progress in Afghanistan.

"The fiscal choices we face are difficult ones, but there should be no doubt, here in the United States or around the world - we will keep our Armed Forces the best-trained, best-led, best equipped fighting force in history," Obama wrote.

"States such as China and Iran will continue to pursue asymmetric means to counter our power projections capabilities, while the proliferation of sophisticated weapons and technology will extend to non-state actors as well," the administration document said.

Titled "Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense," it provides the bare bones of a defense strategy that will become more detailed as the White House and Congress prepare the 2013 budget.

The plan already has run into opposition from Republicans on Capitol Hill and GOP presidential candidates concerned about paring back the military. In addition, conservative defense analysts say the plan steps away from the long-time U.S. commitment to be able to wage two major wars simultaneously.

There is no overt mention in the strategy document, however, that the U.S. is stopping its policy of being ready to fight two-ground wars simultaneously, but the reduced size suggests that is the case.

The Republican Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee said Thursday that the plan was "a lead from behind strategy for a left-behind America."

"The president has packaged our retreat from the world in the guise of a new strategy to mask his divestment of our military and national defense. This strategy ensures American decline in exchange for more failed domestic programs," Rep. Buck McKeon, R-California, said in a statement Thursday.

"In order to justify massive cuts to our military, he has revoked the guarantee that America will support our allies, defend our interests, and defy our opponents. The president must understand that the world has always had, and will always have a leader. As America steps back, someone else will step forward."

And in a signal of how carefully the administration had orchestrated this announcement in the midst of fiscal austerity as well as a presidential campaign year, the nation's highest ranking military man also threw his weight behind the reforms.

"It is a sound strategy," the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey said in prepared remarks. "It ensures we remain the pre-eminent military in the world. It preserves the talent of the all-volunteer force. It takes into account the lessons of the last ten years of war."

Dempsey referred to the uproar over the change from a two-war policy.

"Our strategy has always been about our ability to respond to global contingencies wherever and whenever they happen. This does not change," Dempsey said. "We can and will always be able to do more than one thing at a time. More importantly, wherever we are confronted and in whatever sequence, we will win."

He said he was pleased with the outcome of the strategy review. "It's not perfect," Dempsey said. "It gives us what we need, in this world and within this budget."

The administration noted the high cost of a decade of wars, with more than 46,000 men and women wounded and more than 6,200 members of the armed forces killed.

In another recognition of hard economic times, the strategy includes a promise to help veterans find work in the civilian economy.

"As the Department reduces the size of the force, we will do so in a way that respects these sacrifices," the administration noted. "This means, among other things, taking concrete steps to facilitate the transition to those who will leave the service. These include supporting programs to help veterans translate their military skills for the civilians workforce and aid their search for jobs."

Defense contractors and civilian workers also will feel the impact of Thursday's announcement and how it ripples through the system of defense contracts in coming years. Boeing has announced that one of its plants, which produces B-52 and 767 tankers in Wichita, Kansas, which now employs more than 2160 workers, will shut.

"The decision to close our Wichita facility was difficult but ultimately was based on a thorough study of the current and future market environment and our ability to remain competitive while meeting our customers' needs with the best and most affordable solutions," said Mark Bass, Boeing vice president said in a press release.

Tags: budget, war, United States, Obama

1-6-21012: Karzai appears to endorse U.S., Taliban talks over Qatar office

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Thursday, 05 January 2012 Category Daily News

Karzai's announcement Wednesday followed news a day earlier from the Taliban that it tentatively agreed to open an office in Qatar's capital city of Doha to facilitate talks on the Afghan conflict.

It appears to be the first time the Taliban -- who ruled Afghanistan from 1996 until 2001, when they were ousted in a U.S.-led invasion -- have offered talks without the condition of an American withdrawal from the country.

"Afghanistan, to save the country from war, conspiracies, the killing of innocent Afghans and to reach peace, agrees with the talks between United States of America and Taliban that will end up in establishing an office for Taliban in Qatar," Karzai said in a palace statement.

In the statement, Karzai appeared to broadly endorse peace negotiations for a country that has been embroiled in more than 30 years of war.

It was unclear what, if any, outcome there would be in talks between the United States and the Taliban as Karzai, top Afghan peace officials and the Americans have all previously said that talks had to take place between Afghans.

"The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan with an emphasize on its firm position yet again, believes that talks and negotiation are the only way to reach peace and to come out of the atmosphere of war and imposed violence on Afghan nation," the palace statement said.

Recent media reports have said the United States and other foreign governments with a stake in the Afghan war may try to strike a separate deal with the Taliban.

The Washington Post reported in December that the Obama administration reached a tentative deal with Taliban negotiators that would have included the transfer of five Afghans from Guantanamo Bay, and the Taliban's public renunciation of international terrorism.

The deal collapsed, the Post said, because of Karzai's objections.

Any talk of a peace process slowed in September, when suicide bombers killed senior Afghan peace negotiator and former President Burhannudin Rabbani.

Ismail Qassemyar, a member of Afghanistan's High Peace Council has called peace talks "an Afghan process" and warned against the United States or other nations trying to strike their own peace deal with the group.

Qassemyar said a Taliban office in Qatar would by no means legitimize the Islamist group.

Karzai told CNN in December that the government cannot hold talks until the Islamic militia identifies a representative with the authority to negotiate.

Tags: Obama, Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai, taliban

1/4/2012 Guantanamo Bay Taliban Detainees To Be Released: Report

0 Comments by Security Solutions International
Security Solutions International
SSI has not set their biography yet
User is currently online
Wednesday, 04 January 2012 Category Daily News

Several high-ranking officials are included among the detainees who would be released, The Guardian notes. Fox News reported last week that Mullah Mohammed Fazl, who was suspected of killing Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan, is among those being considered for release.

According to the Associated Press, the only U.S. soldier held by the Taliban is 25-year-old Bowe Bergdahl of Idaho, who was taken prisoner in 2009.

The Taliban opening a liaison office has become a central focus for the United States to begin peace talks with the organization, and could indicate the Taliban's possible willingness to begin negotiations.

"Right now, having a strong presence in Afghanistan, we still want to have a political office for negotiations," Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said, according to the Associated Press.

Releasing prisoners from Guantanamo would be a tricky operation. "To take this step, the [Obama] administration have to have sufficient confidence that the Taliban are going to reciprocate," former Obama administration advisor Vali Nasr told The Guardian.

Tags: Zabiullah Mujahid, terrorism, Bowe Bergdahl, Afghanistan, Shiite Muslims, Mullah Mohammed Fazl, Qatar, Muslim, Obama, Guantanamo Bay, taliban

Questions?

call-us-button
email-us-button